AiSensy vs Gallabox: which one — and do you need either?
Drag & drop builder, live simulator, your own provider — and you keep the full code.
AiSensy and Gallabox overlap less than their listings suggest. AiSensy is a marketing engine — campaigns, broadcasts and ads at value pricing with a free tier. Gallabox is a sales workspace — a no-code builder feeding a shared team inbox with lead workflows. Marketing-led teams lean AiSensy; sales-led teams lean Gallabox.
| AiSensy | Gallabox | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free tier; paid plans for advanced features | Paid plans |
| Meta message rates | No markup — Meta's rates passed through | Standard BSP conversation billing |
| Bot building | Chatbot flows included; campaign-first product | No-code bot builder included |
| Team inbox | Team inbox on paid plans | Shared team inbox with sales workflows |
| Own your bot's code | No — managed cloud | No — managed cloud |
Competitor plans, pricing and features change often — always check the vendor's own site for current details. Comparisons below reflect publicly available information as of mid-2026 and our reading of each product's positioning.
Choose AiSensy if…
…WhatsApp is primarily a marketing channel for you — campaigns, broadcasts, click-to-WhatsApp ads. AiSensy's edge is broadcast campaigns and marketing automation at Indian-market pricing.
Choose Gallabox if…
…a sales team qualifies WhatsApp leads together and wants no-code workflows around that. Gallabox's edge is a no-code builder paired with a sales-focused team inbox and lead workflows.
The third option: build the bot free and own it
If what you actually need from AiSensy or Gallabox is the WhatsApp bot itself — menus, FAQs, bookings, orders, lead capture — you may not need a subscription at all. FlowBot builds the bot as a drag-and-drop flowchart, free: test it in a live simulator, launch it on your own provider account (Meta Cloud API, Twilio, Green API or Whapi.cloud) and export the complete Node.js code whenever you like. A live inbox with human takeover, funnel analytics and a website chat widget are included. What it isn't: a managed BSP with a multi-agent campaign suite — that's exactly the part AiSensy and Gallabox charge for.
Full comparisons: FlowBot vs AiSensy · FlowBot vs Gallabox · the full comparison hub.
Try it in minutes — no signup needed to build and simulate: open the free builder, or read how to make a WhatsApp bot.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, AiSensy or Gallabox?
Neither is universally better. AiSensy fits when WhatsApp is primarily a marketing channel for you — campaigns, broadcasts, click-to-WhatsApp ads. Gallabox fits when a sales team qualifies WhatsApp leads together and wants no-code workflows around that. If you only need the bot itself, consider whether you need either — FlowBot builds and runs one free on your own Meta, Twilio, Green API or Whapi account.
Is there a free alternative to AiSensy and Gallabox?
Yes — FlowBot. The visual builder, templates, live simulator, website widget, inbox with human takeover and full Node.js code export are free; you pay only your WhatsApp provider's message costs. Unlike a managed BSP, you can export the bot and leave any time.
Which is better for lead generation, AiSensy or Gallabox?
For generating leads (click-to-WhatsApp ads, broadcasts), AiSensy's marketing tooling fits. For qualifying and closing leads as a team, Gallabox's sales inbox fits. The bot that captures and routes those leads is something you can also build free — FlowBot's Collect blocks save answers as variables and hand off to a human when needed.
Build your WhatsApp bot in minutes — free
No signup needed to try it. Drag blocks, wire them up, test in the simulator.
Open the free builder