Interakt vs Gallabox: which one — and do you need either?
Drag & drop builder, live simulator, your own provider — and you keep the full code.
Interakt and Gallabox both court Indian SMBs, from different angles. Interakt is commerce infrastructure — D2C catalog tooling and unified WhatsApp + Instagram, quarterly billing. Gallabox is a team workspace — no-code bot builder plus a sales inbox with lead workflows. Pick by which mirrors your day: running a store, or running a pipeline.
| Interakt | Gallabox | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Quarterly plans | Paid plans |
| Meta message rates | Standard BSP conversation billing | Standard BSP conversation billing |
| Bot building | Automation workflows included | No-code bot builder included |
| Team inbox | Shared team inbox | Shared team inbox with sales workflows |
| Own your bot's code | No — managed cloud | No — managed cloud |
Competitor plans, pricing and features change often — always check the vendor's own site for current details. Comparisons below reflect publicly available information as of mid-2026 and our reading of each product's positioning.
Choose Interakt if…
…you run a D2C store and want WhatsApp and Instagram handled in one dashboard. Interakt's edge is D2C e-commerce tooling and unified WhatsApp + Instagram handling.
Choose Gallabox if…
…a sales team qualifies WhatsApp leads together and wants no-code workflows around that. Gallabox's edge is a no-code builder paired with a sales-focused team inbox and lead workflows.
The third option: build the bot free and own it
If what you actually need from Interakt or Gallabox is the WhatsApp bot itself — menus, FAQs, bookings, orders, lead capture — you may not need a subscription at all. FlowBot builds the bot as a drag-and-drop flowchart, free: test it in a live simulator, launch it on your own provider account (Meta Cloud API, Twilio, Green API or Whapi.cloud) and export the complete Node.js code whenever you like. A live inbox with human takeover, funnel analytics and a website chat widget are included. What it isn't: a managed BSP with a multi-agent campaign suite — that's exactly the part Interakt and Gallabox charge for.
Full comparisons: FlowBot vs Interakt · FlowBot vs Gallabox · the full comparison hub.
Try it in minutes — no signup needed to build and simulate: open the free builder, or read how to make a WhatsApp bot.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Interakt or Gallabox?
Neither is universally better. Interakt fits when you run a D2C store and want WhatsApp and Instagram handled in one dashboard. Gallabox fits when a sales team qualifies WhatsApp leads together and wants no-code workflows around that. If you only need the bot itself, consider whether you need either — FlowBot builds and runs one free on your own Meta, Twilio, Green API or Whapi account.
Is there a free alternative to Interakt and Gallabox?
Yes — FlowBot. The visual builder, templates, live simulator, website widget, inbox with human takeover and full Node.js code export are free; you pay only your WhatsApp provider's message costs. Unlike a managed BSP, you can export the bot and leave any time.
I run a Shopify/D2C store — Interakt or Gallabox?
Interakt's D2C tooling and Instagram coverage make it the more store-shaped choice; Gallabox counters with sales workflows if your revenue comes from conversations rather than catalog traffic. For the storefront bot itself — catalog, order status, payment links — FlowBot's free e-commerce template covers it and exports the code.
Build your WhatsApp bot in minutes — free
No signup needed to try it. Drag blocks, wire them up, test in the simulator.
Open the free builder