Wati vs Gallabox: which one — and do you need either?
Drag & drop builder, live simulator, your own provider — and you keep the full code.
Wati and Gallabox both sell a managed WhatsApp inbox for SMB teams, so this choice is about flavour: Wati goes deeper on CRM integrations (Zoho, HubSpot, Salesforce) and support workflows, while Gallabox pairs a friendlier no-code builder with sales-focused lead workflows. Both are subscriptions; neither lets you take the bot with you.
| Wati | Gallabox | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Paid monthly plans; automation on higher tiers | Paid plans |
| Meta message rates | Adds a markup on Meta's conversation rates | Standard BSP conversation billing |
| Bot building | Visual flow builder on paid tiers | No-code bot builder included |
| Team inbox | Mature shared team inbox with roles | Shared team inbox with sales workflows |
| Own your bot's code | No — managed cloud | No — managed cloud |
Competitor plans, pricing and features change often — always check the vendor's own site for current details. Comparisons below reflect publicly available information as of mid-2026 and our reading of each product's positioning.
Choose Wati if…
…your support team lives in a shared inbox and your CRM must stay in sync. Wati's edge is a mature team inbox and deep CRM integrations (Zoho, HubSpot, Salesforce).
Choose Gallabox if…
…a sales team qualifies WhatsApp leads together and wants no-code workflows around that. Gallabox's edge is a no-code builder paired with a sales-focused team inbox and lead workflows.
The third option: build the bot free and own it
If what you actually need from Wati or Gallabox is the WhatsApp bot itself — menus, FAQs, bookings, orders, lead capture — you may not need a subscription at all. FlowBot builds the bot as a drag-and-drop flowchart, free: test it in a live simulator, launch it on your own provider account (Meta Cloud API, Twilio, Green API or Whapi.cloud) and export the complete Node.js code whenever you like. A live inbox with human takeover, funnel analytics and a website chat widget are included. What it isn't: a managed BSP with a multi-agent campaign suite — that's exactly the part Wati and Gallabox charge for.
Full comparisons: FlowBot vs Wati · FlowBot vs Gallabox · the full comparison hub.
Try it in minutes — no signup needed to build and simulate: open the free builder, or read how to make a WhatsApp bot.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Wati or Gallabox?
Neither is universally better. Wati fits when your support team lives in a shared inbox and your CRM must stay in sync. Gallabox fits when a sales team qualifies WhatsApp leads together and wants no-code workflows around that. If you only need the bot itself, consider whether you need either — FlowBot builds and runs one free on your own Meta, Twilio, Green API or Whapi account.
Is there a free alternative to Wati and Gallabox?
Yes — FlowBot. The visual builder, templates, live simulator, website widget, inbox with human takeover and full Node.js code export are free; you pay only your WhatsApp provider's message costs. Unlike a managed BSP, you can export the bot and leave any time.
Which is easier for a non-technical team, Wati or Gallabox?
Gallabox generally gets the nod for no-code friendliness; Wati's flow builder sits on its higher tiers. If ease-of-building is the whole question, also try FlowBot's free drag-and-drop canvas — there's no signup, so you can judge in ten minutes.
Build your WhatsApp bot in minutes — free
No signup needed to try it. Drag blocks, wire them up, test in the simulator.
Open the free builder